{"id":1362,"date":"2010-08-24T13:48:25","date_gmt":"2010-08-24T03:48:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelwyres.com\/?p=1362"},"modified":"2010-08-24T13:48:25","modified_gmt":"2010-08-24T03:48:25","slug":"twitter-copyright-and-etiquette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/2010\/08\/twitter-copyright-and-etiquette\/","title":{"rendered":"Twitter: Copyright and Etiquette"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to what you do &#8211; (or don&#8217;t) &#8211; post on Twitter, I think it would be a reasonable point of etiquette not to modify something someone has posted to suit your own view, and infer that the original person is responsible for the comment.<\/p>\n<p>I struck a situation like this last night.  It related to the ongoing drama involved with the resolution to who will govern Australia in minority, after the election this Saturday passed resulted in a hung parliament.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/NewtonMark\">Mark Newton<\/a>, a champion of the plight to de-rail the mandatory internet filtering plan for Australia &#8211; (which now appears to have succeeded) &#8211; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/NewtonMark\/status\/21897490756\">made a comment<\/a> regarding Greens Senator <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/SenatorLudlam\">Scott Ludlam<\/a> being a good choice to become Communications Minister in whatever form of parliament is negotiated into existence.  Here is Mark&#8217;s tweet:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>I completely agree with the thought, and feel that Senator Ludlam would be an excellent choice, given the foresight and level-headed thinking he has shown in this arena.  I <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/mwyres\/status\/21897738252\">posted back to Mark<\/a> in agreement with his sentinment here:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Sometime later, I noticed a &#8220;mention&#8221; of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/mwyres\/\">my twitter account<\/a> against the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/MervinsNo1Fan\/status\/21899397343\">following tweet<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>As you can see, my previous tweet had been modified to promote one of those stupid &#8211; (yet often humourous) &#8211; Twitter accounts created to take the piss out of our politicians.  A noble cause maybe, but trying to suggest that it was a comment that I had made, I find annoying.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not pissed off, and there&#8217;s certainly nothing much I can do about it, even if I wanted to, but I thought it an interesting case of incorrect Twitter etiquette.  Anyone reading the third tweet could be excused for thinking that the comment came from me, and in someway I endorse this particular Twitter account &#8211; which because I have nothing to do with it, I do not.<\/p>\n<p>It raises the issue of who owns your tweets, and whether they can ultimately be &#8220;copyrighted&#8221;.  The following article discusses that point rather well.<\/p>\n<p><center>\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"80%\" cellpadding\t=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n  <tr>\n    <td class=\"linkbox\"><a class=\"linkboxtext\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wipo.int\/wipo_magazine\/en\/2009\/04\/article_0005.html\">Are Tweets Copyright-Protected?<\/td>\n  <\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/center>\n<\/p>\n<p>In the end, it raises questions that are difficult to answer in this &#8220;etiquette&#8221; situation.  I don&#8217;t care that the person &#8220;liked&#8221; my tweet enough to reuse it &#8211; but would rather they take my name off it if they are going to modify it to suit their own ends.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to what you do &#8211; (or don&#8217;t) &#8211; post on Twitter, I think it would be a reasonable point of etiquette not to modify something someone has posted to suit your own view, and infer that the original person is responsible for the comment. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[212,561],"class_list":["post-1362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology","tag-etiquette","tag-twitter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}