{"id":430,"date":"2010-02-13T09:49:46","date_gmt":"2010-02-12T22:49:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelwyres.com\/?p=430"},"modified":"2010-02-13T09:49:46","modified_gmt":"2010-02-12T22:49:46","slug":"vline-time-to-develop-a-clue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/2010\/02\/vline-time-to-develop-a-clue\/","title":{"rendered":"V\/Line: Time to Develop a Clue!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now, I do not &#8211; and would not &#8211; pretend to understand the finer intricacies of the management of a fleet of trains, but I would like to think that some common sense would come into it &#8211; somewhere.  Hopefully.<\/p>\n<p>Alas, events at Southern Cross Station on Friday evening leave me wondering if &#8220;common sense&#8221; even appears in the V\/Line Operations Manual.  It does not appear to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Service number 8235 (otherwise known as the 17:29 Southern Cross to Marshall) was once again found to be in disarray &#8211; alarming given that it (along with service number 8229, otherwise known as the 16:40 Southern Cross to Marshall) are supposed to be the &#8220;flagship services&#8221; on the Geelong line.<\/p>\n<p>Pfft!<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a quick rundown of the sequence last night.  At approximately 5:00pm, a train arrived from Ballarat, consisting of a single 3VL DMU, number 32.  Passengers alighted, and it seemed ready to form the rear of service 8235.  Here it is at 5:10pm, still standing on the platform:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>One minute later, it left, disappearing into the yard, never to be seen again.  Here is the empty platform:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>It did however, wait at the far end of the platform for about a minute, before disappearing:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>At 5:19pm &#8211; a mere ten minutes before the scheduled departure, a pair of empty V&#8217;Locity DMUs arrived on the platform &#8211; 2VL03, and 3VL27.  So we have five carriages of the normal seven carriage service.  Okay, some progress.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>We just have to wait for another 2VL to arrive, right?  Wrong!<\/p>\n<p>At 5:25pm, just four minutes from departure, a boarding call is made for the five carriages, with clearly no extra carriages to be delivered to complete the service.  A seven-carriage load of passengers cram into a five-carriage service.  Squeezy!<\/p>\n<p>Now, here&#8217;s where the annoyance comes from.  Leaving the station, I counted six &#8211; yes SIX &#8211; vacant V&#8217;Locity units sitting in the yard, seemingly not doing much.  The original 3VL23 was nowhere to be seen.  3VL35 was one of the empty, yard bound units, as seen here:<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>There were three other units nearby, and two more sitting in the wash road at the EDI Rail maintenance depot.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the original 3VL23 couldn&#8217;t have stayed, and have 3VL35 join it for a total of six carriages.  Still not seven, but better than five.<\/p>\n<p>Okay &#8211; maybe 3VL23 was declared &#8220;defective&#8221; and even 3VL35 might have been &#8220;defective&#8221; also.  What about the other six units?  Were they ALL declared defective?<\/p>\n<p>If they were &#8211; why are so many almost new trains breaking down?  If they weren&#8217;t, why couldn&#8217;t we have some of them &#8211; or even one of them &#8211; to form something resembling a full service?<\/p>\n<p>The annoying part is, yesterday&#8217;s service 8235 will be declared to have run, and to have run &#8220;on time&#8221;.  So it won&#8217;t affect their performance figures.  But only five sevenths of the service ran and ran on time!<\/p>\n<p>Most frustratingly of all, there were no announcements made.  No explanation for the reduced service, and no apology for the reduced service.  Just the usual and trite &#8211; &#8220;welcome aboard this V\/Line service, we hope you have a pleasant journey!&#8221;.  Nice customer service!<\/p>\n<p>Try telling that to the people crammed into doorways, and sitting on the floor in the aisles.  We&#8217;re not stupid V\/Line &#8211; lift your game and stop hiding behind rubbery performance figures!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now, I do not &#8211; and would not &#8211; pretend to understand the finer intricacies of the management of a fleet of trains, but I would like to think that some common sense would come into it &#8211; somewhere. Hopefully. Alas, events at Southern Cross Station on Friday evening leave me wondering if &#8220;common sense&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-transport"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelwyres.com.au\/mwdc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}