Massive Barnaby Joyce facepalm just now on Twitter, with this tweet, followed by this tweet from Tony Burke, the target of his attack:
Pwned Barnaby!
I wonder if he is really at the almond orchard?
With the V8 Supercars set to race at the new Circuit of the America’s in Texas in 2013, and suggestions that the event may follow a similar guest driver format to the Gold Coast 600 – except using exclusively American drivers – a question comes to mind…
…how would a NASCAR driver do in V8 Supercar?
I think they would do extremely well, and in fact it has already happened.
Of course, Boris Said has had a few runs in our cars, but what about the top drivers? Here’s Dale Earnhardt Jr testing a PMM V8 Supercar at Queensland Raceway in the 2008 off-season.
For a first drive, not bad – the car still had the old H-pattern gear shift, was almost certainly running on old tyres, and was on a track Earnhardt had never seen before.
Jimmie Johnson in a HRT Commodore versus Carl Edwards in an FPR Falcon?
Yes please!
Despite the fervent opposition to the National Broadband Network (NBN) from the Federal Coalition, in recent weeks the Victorian Coalition Government has repeatedly voiced support for the project.
At a recent announcement of an $85m plan to promote ICT within Victoria, Minister for Technology Gordon Rich-Phillips stated that the plan sought to “advocate the expedient upgrade of Victoria’s broadband capacity, including the National Broadband Network.”
On Friday, Rich-Phillips was at it again – this time at the launch of NBN Co’s operations and discovery centres in Melbourne’s Docklands precinct.
NBN Co Opens Operations Centre |
“[Rich-Phillips] agreed that the state government’s support contrasted with the federal Liberal Party’s opposition to the NBN project. “This is not about party politics. We are the Victorian government and as a Victorian minister my job is to maximise the benefits of the NBN [for Victoria].”
Now of course, it is perfectly reasonable for the state and federal parties to have different, and even contradictory policies, but given Malcolm Turnbull opines that the economic justification for the NBN lays outside of what the Liberal Party would consider rational economic policy, it seems that not everyone in the party agrees.
Turnbull has been lambasted for his position, not only in the technology media, but also on his own blog where almost none of the comments against a recent NBN article supported the position he was attempting to alliterate.
During a recent appearance on the ABC Q&A program, Turnbull made not a single mention of anything to do with his shadow communications portfolio – (let alone the NBN) – throughout the entire program, sparking some people to theorise that he might be more interested in other political aspirations, rather than his present role opposite Stephen Conroy.
Respected telecommunications commentator Paul Budde stated at a recent ACS event that he believes that “savings from improved healthcare outcomes alone will cover cost to build the NBN”.
Recently on his widely read blog, reporting on a visit to Central Victoria he noted:
“I was very pleasantly surprised that I encountered no resistance to the NBN anywhere. On the contrary, the NBN had the absolute support of the close to 400 leaders I met during this trip. The reason that I mention this is that the people in regional Australia are often slightly more conservative than metro dwellers; however it appears that very little of the current political discord is affecting their interest in, and support for, the NBN.”
It seems that too many of the arguments against the project Turnbull believes in, just aren’t holding up in the real world.
Turnbull should stop fiddling with his iPad and start listening.
If you were going to build a scarecrow in the garden of a hospital rehabilitation ward – how would you do it?
In a wheelchair of course!
Perfectly logical.
There’s been some suggestion floating around in recent days – (particularly on Twitter) – that it was I who coined the phrase “Noalition” that was used by Anthony Albanese in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, to describe the opposition coalition, and their “negative” behaviour.
As much as I would love to – (and easily could) – play along and let people keep thinking that I thought it up, I’m too honest for that.
The bottom line is I don’t know who coined it. I saw it used on Twitter last week, but now cannot find the original tweet – it’s either been deleted, or Twitter isn’t letting me search far enough back for it.
It does appear that I am responsible for spreading it around online enough that it came to Albanese’s attention on Tuesday, and I guess that is something I can hang my hat on.
For the record, I’m traditionally a conservative voter, but I find the current opposition almost impossible to support. Constant negativity is not the way to drive policy forward in Australia.
Equally for the record, I didn’t coin “Noalition”.
But it’s funny, and I love it!
Seems in the wake of Kyle Sandilands calling a news.com.au reporter a “fat slag”, and Holden pulling their sponsorship from Sandilands’ radio show as a result, that someone at News Limited may have wanted to subliminally call him a girl?
Holden Pulls Sponsorship of Kyle and Jackie O Show |
Freudian?
Maybe.
Jason Richards – who stepped down from driving the #8 Team BOC Commodore a year ago to fight stomach cancer – made an appearance at Sandown today, and took a moment to speak to the television audience about how his fight is going.
Alas, it sounds not to be going so well at all.
Get well Jason…the whole V8 Supercars community is behind you…but it was great to see you up and about.
It is often stated by people who do not understand, that motor sport is not really a sport, that all competitors do is drive an engine around in a car all day, around and around in circles. Of course, racing drivers are among some of the fittest athletes on the planet.
And some of the bravest. For example, have a look at some brief wet weather highlights of the most recent V8 Supercars event, held today at Sandown International Raceway:
Many motor sport categories involved in banked oval track racing – (such as NASCAR) – due to higher centrifugal forces, are suspended when it rains. Many road racing series stick it out with wet weather tyres.
Bravery to the extreme.
Many people will remember the “storm in a teacup” that was the inadvertent possible collection by Google of data from wireless networks, when performing photographic and geo-spatial data collection for their Street View product early last year.
Even our good friend Senator Stephen Conroy got in on the act, labelling it the “single biggest privacy breach in history”, a statement the Privacy Commission of course distanced itself from.
Indeed, Google was investigated by many legal bodies around the world in relationship to these incidents and were invariably found to have no case to answer. Any data that was collected was found to be inadvertent, and was most likely useless to anyone anyway.
Google also agreed to dump any of this data.
It is still reasonable however, to ask why they were collecting any wireless information in the first place, since the data was always going to be completely useless to them. The answer is that they were in fact collecting location information.
As they drove down my street, they would have spotted my wireless network as they drove past my house.
When they found “FAB_WIRELESS_NETWORK” – (obviously, not the real SSID of my network) – they would have recorded the GPS coordinates of the Street View car, and filed it away.
It is quite straightforward to deduce that if ever a mobile device accessing Google Maps and/or Google Street View ever came across the MAC address of the access point broadcasting “FAB_WIRELESS_NETWORK“, then it is more than likely that they are at or very close to the location the Street View car was when it first detected my network.
Basically, all it is doing is helping to refine and improve location detection services on that mobile device, by adding another reference point to the calculation.
The name of the network doesn’t pop up in Google Maps – the information is simply used in the background to assist in geo-locating the device.
That’s all they were doing.
Now, many people will still feel uncomfortable with this, and Google has responsibly provided a “solution”:
Taking Wi-Fi Networks from Google’s Map |
“Android devices collect [these] MAC addresses, and beam them back to Google to be used in the company’s geolocation database — a useful feature that allows faster location fixes for mobile phones.”
The solution is to append “_NOMAP” to the end of your SSID, and next time around, they won’t retain any information when they detect your network. It is an elegantly simple opt-out mechanism.
However, the problem is they still have the MAC address in their database, and mobile devices will still be able to collect that information and beam it back to Google to assist in geo-location.
Changing the SSID of your wireless network does not change the MAC address of your access point.
Presumably when they next come past, they will have cleared out the database and they will ignore your network. However Street View only comes by and re-collects information every two or three years – so for two or three years, you’re network information is still in there, even if you append “_NOMAP” to your network name today.
It’s a start – but in my opinion, it would be much better to allow people to provide their MAC address/SSID combination, so people can have their networks removed now, instead of two or three years from now.
Personally, I don’t have a problem with my network being in there, but many people will care and will think that changing the name of their wireless network – (if they even know about this solution at all) – will fix the issue immediately.
It won’t.
This video from Macquarie University has been around since August – but with recent announcements from the Federal Opposition regarding policy towards the National Broadband Network (NBN), and their ill-conceived, badly under engineered and ultimately more expensive Fibre to the Node (FTTN) plan, I thought it pertinent to spread this one out more widely.
As a warning, it is quite technical in places, and if you choose to watch it right through its entire 56 minute length, I suggest you get a cuppa and a few biscuits ready before you start, but it is worth it if you want to understand what is really happening out there – rather than all the misinformation that is out there.
I’ve heard Peter Ferris speak on a number of occasions, and having spent more than 16 years in the IT industry myself, dealing with telco issues for much of that career, I don’t think I’ve ever struck a person with as much intrinsic knowledge on this stuff as he.
Watch and learn.